RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL CHOOSES REDISTRICTING MAP

Don Gosney
By:

At their meeting of Tuesday January 14th, the Richmond City Council voted to accept a map breaking up Richmond into six wards for the purpose of electing Councilmembers.

This was the result of a Threat Letter sent to the City by Attorney Scott Rafferty demanding such action to ensure that minorities have a better chance of getting elected to the Council.  [Had the Council rebuffed that letter, a lawsuit would have ensued that could have cost the City millions of dollars with the same end result.]

'20_Richmond_Redistricting___RFR.jpg

The fact that the Council is made up of six minorities right now and over the past 25 years there was 75% minority representation. None of that mattered for the purposes of this action.

There was an exhaustive process of numerous public meetings to allow input from the public on how the maps should be drawn and once drawn, there were well over two dozen maps for the Council to consider.

The Council went back and forth expressing their own views about which map was most appropriate, which ethnicity might be best covered and, even which map protected sitting members of the Council.

Gerrymandering was not allowed but almost all of the maps smacked of gerrymandering to some degree.

When all was said and done, the Council accepted the map that is attached here.

[The map found on the City’s web site is not very detailed.  It shows mostly landmarks and not street names.  The street names shown are often 3 blocks high so it’s difficult to see which line on the map it’s referring to.

To see a more detailed map, the interactive map can be found here:

https://ndcresearch.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=85edf4e13a3b4c4b9f75d7c9d5dde6c1

When the map was selected, the Council then had to decide which of the three districts would be up for election in 2020 and which three in 2022.

Of course, they needed to consider where the six Councilmembers currently live.

There was concern about districts where multiple Councilmembers reside. 

Unless Councilmembers have recently moved, the wards have the following Councilmembers living within:

Ward 1: Empty

Ward 2: Nat Bates & Jael Myrick

Ward 3: Empty

Ward 4: Empty

Ward 5: Ben Choi & Eduardo Martinez

Ward 6: Demnlus Johnson & Melvin Willis

Councilmembers Ben Choi, Jael Myrick and Melvin Willis are up for election in 2020 but during the process, Councilmember Myrick announced that he would not be seeking reelection in 2020.

In Ward 6, Councilmembers Demnlus Johnson (2022) and Melvin Willis (2020) reside.  In Ward 5, Councilmembers Ben Choi (2020) and Eduardo Martinez (2022) reside.

The fact that two wards (5 and 6) have two sitting Councilmembers residing within brings up issues on what the incumbents who are up for election can do.

The Council chose to host elections in Wards 1, 5 and 6.

At the end of the meeting, City Staff could not explain with any clarity how this might happen and two Councilmembers had differing ideas about how this is to handled.

Radio Free Richmond reached out to James Atencio from the Richmond City Attorney’s Office for a clarification:

In a Ward where there is an incumbent that is NOT up for election this year (Candidate A) and an incumbent who IS up for election (Candidate B), there are three scenarios:

  • Candidate B can choose not to run for reelection in 2020 and wait until Candidate A’s term is up and run in 2022.
  • Candidate A can choose to run in 2020 and run against Candidate B to represent that ward. The victor will have a four-year term.  If Candidate A is victorious, he/she serves for a four-year term and vacates the two years remaining on his/her current term.  The City Council will then have the option to appoint someone to fill that seat AFTER the swearing in of the newly elected Councilmembers.
  • If Candidate B is victorious, Candidate B would serve a four-year term as the elected representative of that Ward. Candidate A would still have his/her remaining two years left to serve.

After this election, residents in Ward 3 (the Southside) and Ward 4 (El Sobrante/Carriage Hills/Fairmede-Hilltop) will have no designated member of the Council to speak on their behalf.  They will have to rely on the three remaining At Large Councilmembers to stand up for their needs.  In a perfect world, every member of the Council will be representing the entire city but in cities where wards/districts have been set up, that is not often the case.

The Council will revisit the idea of ranked voting and of an independent committee for redrawing the wards once the 2020 census data is available.

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Kara Braxton
    commented 2020-01-17 11:50:15 -0800
    And when you become a “minority” , then you have the right to tell me how it affects you. Just because someone else uses the term, does not mean, it’s ok for you to do so.
  • Don Gosney
    commented 2020-01-17 09:17:49 -0800
    Kara, You may not like the term “minorities” but that’s the word used in the Threat Letter sent by Attorney Rafferty and the intent of this action forced upon us. The purpose of the Voting Rights Act is to ensure that ‘minorities’ have a better chance at representation on elected bodies.
  • Kara Braxton
    commented 2020-01-16 12:07:43 -0800
    I just wish you had not brought up the term “Minorities”. The districts …if you look at them had nothing to do with the “minorities” who sit on the council, but about development and the gentrification that is going on in Richmond. District 2 is separated, but it includes Marina Bay, Discoverery Bay, ALL the waterfront, and Hilltop…which those communities already get preferential treatment by the city. District 4 does as well. They are gentrified. Districts 1, 6,3 and 5 are well are their way to being gentrified, but actually have the highest number of minorities in the city compared to the other districts.
Fight your California speeding ticket and win here. Fight your red light camera ticket here. Fight your cell phone ticket here.