What Did and Didn't Happen Last Night: the Richmond City Council Meeting, Tuesday, July 15th


By:

blogimage.jpgRichmond's City Council met last night, and, per usual, the meeting was strewn with contention and heated debate. While much public comment was heard, it came at the expense of pressing legislative action. 

What did happen:

The place and shape of public comment was the focus of the July 15th City Council meeting. Between infighting among members of the Council, public comment both thoughtful and absurd took the majority of last night's time.

What some members of the public saw as an attack on First Amendment rights, others saw as a means of protecting Councilmembers from harassment. At hand was item I-8, a piece of legislation spearheaded by Jovanka Beckles and which was voted early in the meeting to take precedence over all other items. I-8, which passed 6-1, directs the city manager and city attorney to look into rules for handling disruptions during City Council meetings. Recent weeks have seen a veil of stagnation fall over the Council as each meeting was taken over by impassioned comments from the public, bringing progress to a standstill.

Public comment both in favor and against Beckles and the proposed legislation took an hour and a half to complete and the Council was exhausted when it finally came to an end just past 11. A detail recap of the lengthy discussion may be found here. Two pressing, time-sensitive matters kept the Council from concluding the meeting at that time, but the half hour allotted to debate wasn't enough to handle the matters.

What didn't happen:

By all appearances, much did happen last night, thought little of it had any legislative impact. Only two of the 24 items slated for discussion were approved. Of the many pieces left out of the discussion was a pressing matter regarding the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan. This item has been on the docket for approval since the June 24th meeting and has yet to be approved, resulting in a loss of funding for some North Richmond services.

While there was much discussion of item I-8 and the rights and restrictions of speech during last night's meeting, little of it had an impact on the day-to-day operations of Richmond. With the approval of I-8, however, a return to functionality in the City Council that many longed for last night may be on its way. The City Council will meet again Tuesday, August 5th.

Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2014-07-23 13:41:42 -0700
    hmmm, how did that work? Disrupt the meetings and then denounce the council for for not getting business done during the disruptions?
  • commented 2014-07-16 21:28:47 -0700
    Richmond is again facing a serious financial deficit while the City Council distracts the public from their culpability by creating drama and uproar over unrelated issues such as personal conflicts. A prominent recent example of this behavior is the ongoing dispute between Councilmember/Finance Committee Chair Beckles and a handful of angry residents. This dispute makes front page news while the much more critical issues of the Council’s intention to reduce City services and push for another regressive sales tax is glossed over. The Council and the City Manager are threatening the public with cutbacks in important services such as police, firefighters, code enforcement and street repair unless we vote for an increase in the sales tax in November. Why should we pay for their mistakes and negligence?
Fight your California speeding ticket and win here. Fight your red light camera ticket here. Fight your cell phone ticket here.